4500 Square Feet Tropical House on a Very Small Lot But With a Garden
Fri, Feb 19, 2010 | Tropical home designs | By Mike
Designed by Rockefeller Partners Architects this house is located off a walk street with great views of the Pacific Ocean and Malibu coastline. Its design is all about a careful space planning. The site is a narrow 30×60-foot area but it includes not only the house but also a garden. This garden is an open green space in the center of the structure at the ground floor level. On one side of this area is a children’s room and a master’s bedroom with a bath. Not only this Zen garden makes the interior to be closer to nature. There are a lot of woodwork that also do so and adds a touch of comfort to the house. [ Rockefeller Partners Architects | Photography by Eric Staudenmaier ]
February 19th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
For such a beautiful and unique house, the (indoor) furniture seems a little bland and conventional. But I do love all of the built-ins and wood accents. Very crisp and modern, yet warm and comfortable.
February 19th, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Sweet, sweet home
February 21st, 2010 at 1:36 am
I really like the wood detailing. I didn’t see any children’s rooms or play areas. Must be for adults only. It’s a very lovely home nonetheless.
February 21st, 2010 at 4:33 am
They are totally assholes can you imagine what the neighbors think compared to their houses and neighborhood
February 21st, 2010 at 6:09 am
I agree – the architecture is very nice, but the quality and character of interiors are lacking. I also think that, while the wood used architecturally is great, that there is just too much wood everywhere.
February 21st, 2010 at 6:34 am
well there goes about 12 acres of old growth forest.
February 21st, 2010 at 3:36 pm
An average European lot is 30 x 60 ft. That’s not small.
February 21st, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Genius! This is gorgeous place! I would live there in a heartbeat!
February 21st, 2010 at 9:14 pm
A real gem. Small but a beauty.
February 21st, 2010 at 9:44 pm
That’s the home I want to live in someday!
René
February 21st, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Disgusting use of wood – probably imported from south america and harvested from ever dwindling supplies in the rain forest. Id like to beat the architect upside the head with a piece of rare tropical wood.
February 22nd, 2010 at 2:45 am
man i wish i could build a earth home here in hamburg ny like that i have some great views here.BUT i do love calafornia.i was there in the 1970
February 22nd, 2010 at 2:46 am
still i can not quit thinking of the buty and ease of your home it even feels like a home
February 22nd, 2010 at 3:13 pm
OMG! im speechless, wow great post and lovely pictures. im just startled with the pictures. Will take some ideas definitely ,as i am getting a chance to design my dream house.
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:46 am
Nice design but why do these houses never have any storage? It’s like the people who live there have no real lives. Where do they keep their books, their kid’s toys, their collection of knickknacks and whatsits?
February 23rd, 2010 at 7:49 pm
I Love it.
For those who say its lacking on the inside should perhaps take in to account the lack of space and the angles this building has.
I think its fantastic. Modern yet simple yet minimalist.
February 23rd, 2010 at 9:11 pm
What definition of ‘small’ are we using here exactly? Only the elite 0.04% of people can afford a lot that big in my city (Karachi, Pakistan).Some of the commentators are right … this architecture is a parasite for the forests too.
February 24th, 2010 at 12:07 am
Make sure you park the Porsche outside the garage for the photo shoot
February 24th, 2010 at 1:50 am
If I lived in a place like this it would drive me mad inside a week. Its soleless and there is no character, no warmth, no closets or cupboard space.
In fact a real shocker. OK for a young couple…until they have kids!
February 24th, 2010 at 7:03 am
i just wanted to let you i thought your homes were awsom but one person was right about the storage
February 24th, 2010 at 6:48 pm
To address some comments here, I’m sure there is (at least some) storage in the home, but usually closets and inhabitants’ personal effects don’t make it into architectural photographs. Overall, a really beautiful home.
February 24th, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Oh brother, now wood is a bad thing? What should it be made out of, concrete? Get real! Making metals and plastic consumes more resources than a tree!
Also, where the hell do you people live? I live on a 3 acre lot and don’t know anyone who lives on a place that small, besides apartments and townhouses and such. and I am definitely not rich. Just because something is common where you live, doesn’t mean it’s not small. That’s SMALL no matter how you look at it.
February 25th, 2010 at 1:47 am
i share gilsons opinion. it’s soulless. looks nice on photos with all it’s right angles, but imagine living in there… the whole place is overly wanting to appeal with wood finishings, marble and “nifty” stuff. it would be like having some douche right next to you all the time who is trying to impress you with the expensiveness of his diamond rings and his tropical tan he got during his all inclusive holiday in dubai…
February 25th, 2010 at 12:24 pm
nice design. great wokr.
February 25th, 2010 at 4:12 pm
It looks fine as long as everything is just perfect: light, temperature, etc.
Photographs well, but no heart. I think living in such a house would be sort of like living in an operating room: sterile and lifeless.
February 25th, 2010 at 5:39 pm
It’s a rich mans home alright. Like to see how well it will stand up to the next big earthquake.
February 26th, 2010 at 5:58 am
Well first of all, I wouldn’t mind this house myself. That said, the furniture is terribly bland and looks like the sort of compromise fittings you get on boats -but I’m guessing it isn’t. I like the idea of lots of wood, but much of the detailing here makes it look more like chipboard veneer. A lot of the beauty in wood is it’s natural shape and grain and here very little of that is exploited. Finally, in the UK I’d expect planners would try to fit two houses onto such a prime site or 4 flats.
February 26th, 2010 at 11:48 am
sold.
February 27th, 2010 at 8:20 pm
A-M-A-Z-I-N-G-!-!-!
February 28th, 2010 at 3:16 am
I would kill to live here, seriouslyyyy.
February 28th, 2010 at 9:27 pm
i cant find the words to describe it
i hope that when i die, heaven will look like this
March 1st, 2010 at 1:11 am
I found agreement and disagreement with most of the comments. Storage is an issue. This home is for people without children, who entertain. Possibly a weekend get away. None of the views, except for the kitchen and stairway, show more than one side.
As for the so called plundering of the rain forests, get a life!! Most of the wood is renewable bamboo that grows to maturity in two years. There wasn’t a stick of Brazilian wood to be seen. Know your facts before trashing someone. If you want to complain, do it about taking the beach front away from the rest of the public while having the government pay to clean the beaches along the coast.
I digress. The house is a little spartan for me. People give a house its soul. This is a new soul looking for character.
Paul
March 4th, 2010 at 3:09 pm
very nice, but to much wood inside for my taste.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:54 pm
The home is just amazing
March 16th, 2010 at 8:41 am
People build for their reasons and they would have taken into account kids’s needs if that was what they had in mind. I like to see timber in homes because it gives it warmth and character but not overdone though. I really appreciatee the use of space and as for soul, I couldn’t agree more with Paul . A great design for its location I reckon.
March 26th, 2010 at 5:24 pm
Hi ricosauvie
I don’t see much bamboo unless it’s veneered.
My first impression was WOW! … if only the architect had known about architectural bamboo – flooring & furniture boards.
Bradley
March 28th, 2010 at 6:37 am
Very nice and cozy place ,it make me comfortable home with little cleaning maintainance.I agree that there are so much wood that overlap the home design.
but over all I just love it so much ,it is my dream home!!!
April 15th, 2010 at 6:10 am
great but living there would be awful, imagine all the dusting!
April 22nd, 2010 at 7:10 pm
A truly gorgeous, amazing home.
I’m equally amazed at the comments here. Why is there so much hate? What is wrong with most of you? Why can’t you make criticisms without loading them with such reckless negativity? Fake physical threats? Claims of this house being souless? Someone even said this is too small. It’s 4500sf! How large are you that you and your family would NEED more space than that?
So much negativity. Makes me wonder who is actually lacking “soul”.
R*
April 23rd, 2010 at 7:05 am
Beautiful, simple, clear space. of course they have magazines, signs of life around when photogs aren’t there but this was a photoshoot, fgs, they cleaned/cleared up. I would have more indoor plants, however, more green to work with wood and stone floors. California, and L.A. designers in particular, are very, very conscious of “ecological footprints” in everything from landscaping to construction. Xeriscape gardens (minimum use of water, succulents & cactus, for e.g.) are all over the place. California is eons ahead of most other states in its consciousness about the environment, recycling and preservation. I’m certain the wood came either from sustainably harvested woodland area, or is reclycled from another location.
April 27th, 2010 at 2:07 am
I want to move in immediately.
April 30th, 2010 at 8:53 am
Concrete is the least environmentally product of all due to the amount of energy and resources required to create it. Not wood which is 100% renewable. Why assume it is from an old growth forest? Unnecessarily spiteful. Jealous anyone? Having said that, I do think the wood is a little overdone for my tastes personally. Otherwise though I do like the Japanese zen meets 50s decor meets Swedish sauna – a mix match of styles all suited to the beach IMO.
April 30th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
It’s a beautiful, well set out property, and compared to European apartments / houses this certainly isn’t small!
May 14th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
Not suitable for visiting grandparents; children; pets; and REAL people.
May 23rd, 2010 at 3:13 am
Small what?It’s 4500 fucking sq feet.
May 29th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
Wow – You can sure tell which posters have an architectural backround and who just wants to set up in some stupid tract house (with lots of storage). This home is exceptionally designed AND decorated.
June 4th, 2010 at 5:52 am
Fucking awesome!
July 3rd, 2010 at 3:10 pm
TOO MUCH WOOD… Pls Try to care some for nature.
July 8th, 2010 at 4:09 am
Looks like they use the term “garden” rather loosely. There’s a “water feature” in the middle of the house from the looks of it. A little bit of natural stone, and a lot outdoor wood. Has the architect never left wood in the weather?